Political Party as Monarchy
When Benazir Bhutto was assassinated on December 27th it was a tragedy as the death of anyone would be. I don’t claim to know enough about the complexities of Pakistani politics to know whether she would have moved the country in a positive direction or if she would have used her power to reward cronies and increase corruption. But she came to a tragic end and misplaced traditions have it they we pretend that dead people have no faults or flaws.
As it happens it isn’t her that has me scratching my head at the moment so we can presume that she was perfect. What has me confused is the fact that her supposed pro-democracy party is in all real senses a monarchy.
The Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) was founded by Benazir Bhutto’s father, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, in 1967 and he became it’s first chairman. In 1979 Zulfikar was accused of ordering the assassination of a political rival. I do not claim to know the veracity of those charges, however the courts of Pakistan found him guilty of those charges and sentenced him to death.
This is where the PPP starts acting odd, though not really odd yet. After the death of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto his wife, Nusrat Bhutto, succeeded him as chairperson of the PPP. A few years later, 1982, Nusrat Bhutto, ill with cancer, left Pakistan. In her absense, her daughter, Benazir Bhutto takes of the mantle of acting chairperson. By January of 1984, Benazir Bhutto is being called chairperson and at some point becomes chairperson for life. As such she was the chairperson at the date of her death, December 27th, 2007.
In short the PPP has been around for some 40 years and in all that time it has never had a chairperson who wasn’t of the Bhutto family. The PPP finding itself without a chairperson stopped acting like a political party and became a monarchy.
By all reports there were a number of capable political leaders the PPP could have tapped to fill the void. An obvious and technically correct choice would have been Makhdoom Amin Fahim, who is the senior vice chairman of the PPP and has all the right credentials. News reports also bandied about the possibility of choosing Aitzaz Ahsan, the leader of the lawyers’ movement.
Instead by some machination or another Benazir’s eldest son, the 19 year old Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, was chosen. Bilwal hasn’t spend any time in Pakistan since he was a young child and any political experience would be indirect at best. He intends to finish his history degree a Christ Church College, Oxford at which time he claims his lineage makes him a natural leader of Pakistan.
In the mean time, his father, Asif Ali Zandari will act as regent. I assume he can’t become chairperson himself because he isn’t of the Bhutto bloodline. Either that or the fact that the Pakistani people consider him largely corrupt. He spend eight years in prison taking bribes when is wive was in charge of Pakistan and laundering them through Swiss bank accounts.
When one BBC journalist asked Bilawal, “What on earth do you propose as a 19-year-old who has hardly lived in the country, what do you propose you can offer Pakistan, a country of 170 million people?” his only response was, “They asked me to do it.”
Taken as a whole it seems a lot more like a monarchy than a political party.